GitLab Ultimate will set you back $99 per user/month versus $21 per user/month for GitHub Enterprise. GitLab itself is open source software, and the self-hosted version is free for anyone to use. While the underlying Git technology and features are virtually identical, the recommended workflow isn’t the same.
Maintenance Mode
Thus, a development platform must have comprehensive and accessible interface guides, which GitHub has optimized for. Everything can be easily accessed on the GitHub dashboard, and they have plenty of guides and tutorials for specific platform-specific operations to help ease user onboarding. On the other hand, GitHub doesn’t offer any built-in deployment features, although third-party platforms can be integrated. GitLab presents a built-in solution for deployment, utilizing Kubernetes or K8s to automate this process.
What to Look For in Version Control and Collaboration Software
GitLab Ultimate plan comes with 8+ scan types and many other governance features out of the box. Whether one approach is better for you depends on the features you need/want built into the platform or if you need to support a specific third-party integration on your project. Offers unlimited private and public repositories on the free plan. Offers unlimited private and public repositories on the free plan as well as CI usage being free on public repositories. As a software engineer, you will frequently use various tools such as your IDE and terminal.
enterprises choose GitLab
In terms of data privacy and security, both platforms perform almost equally. GitLab and GitHub are both excellent, widely used platforms for hosting source code. They also both offer features designed to provide CI/CD, project management, and security functionality, although GitLab’s product suite is broader and deeper in this respect. Overall, GitLab may be a better choice for large enterprises that want to centralize development operations using a single platform.
- Users can find plenty of information about how each platform works, as well as tutorials and guides that offer deep dives into specific features or best practices.
- GitLab is just as effective; it allows you to easily allocate tasks to different team members so that everyone knows what’s expected.
- You might have heard of some GitLab alternatives but where to begin with Gitlab, exactly?
- Yes, you can use GitLab and GitHub together because both are Git-based, allowing simultaneous use and flexibility.
Depending on your needs and priorities, you may see these standout features of GitLab as either an advantage or disadvantage. For example, if you already have a CI/CD suite in place, GitLab’s integrated CI/CD products may not matter to you. But if you’re looking for a one-stop shop for source code management and CI/CD in a single platform, GitLab offers it. GitHub is probably the best-known website for hosting software projects, but it’s certainly not the only one. GitLab has become a popular alternative solution for managing Git repositories. And although GitLab and GitHub offer the same basic functionality at a high level, there are critical differences between the two platforms.
Summary – GitHub vs. GitLab differences
However, there is another tool, Git, and cloud-based Git platforms, such as GitHub and GitLab, which are often overlooked but quite useful. In this post, we will examine Git and both of these cloud platforms in-depth https://traderoom.info/ to help you decide which one is most suitable for your specific needs. GitLab and GitHub have their strengths and weaknesses, and they can be incredibly beneficial when implemented for the right projects.
In this post we’ve gone over a bit of history, the major and minor differences between the two, and the pivotal features that may make you choose one over the other. While moving your project from one to the other is very feasible, it’s never a good experience having to move platforms. Making the right choice at the right point in time can save you many work hours. GitHub is much older than GitLab, which means a lot of users that are using the platform for a long time and are very proficient with it.
Anyone who has access to the wiki page can add and edit its content. As one of the Atlassian tools, Bitbucket integrates seamlessly with other Atlassian software. There are also thousands of apps available in the Atlassian Marketplace.
Meanwhile, GitLab’s built-in issue tracker has similar features, but visually it’s much simpler than its counterpart. Because GitHub has been around since 2008 and is the most popular software repository platform, it has https://traderoom.info/gitlab-vs-github/ integrations with some of the most popular platforms, such as Slack and Microsoft Teams. GitLab has uniquely placed itself as a comprehensive DevSecOps platform that brings its own powerful DevOps features and tools.
With this platform, teams can collaborate on their development work with the same system that GitLab offers. It’s a complete Development Operations platform where teams can collaborate on multiple projects, share codes, and work on solving the same problem without affecting each other’s work. Based on the features and plans on offer on these platforms, it’s clear that both of them have aspects that are ideal for certain scenarios. GitLab took a similar path and offers multiple integrations for development and DevOps teams. GitLab realized the need for better and deeper integrations between development and DevOps toolchains. With the latest release of 10.0, GitLab rethinks the scope of tooling for both developers and operation teams.
Unlike SVN, which only allows committing code to the main repository, Git allows developers to commit code to their local checked-out code. This is a significant improvement over SVN’s system which allows developing large code features locally to completion before merging it to the main repository. In SVN the agreed-upon method for achieving something similar would be to create a branch in the main repository, which can quickly cause branch bloat and become a nightmare to manage.
GitHub has one of the largest communities of developers and enthusiasts worldwide. Considering this, it won’t be wrong to say that GitHub’s active and connected community is one of the reasons behind its success. In terms of raw speed and response time, GitHub is faster, but in areas like CI/CD and advanced monitoring and analytics tools, GitLab is way ahead. And if you’re ready to try out a customer feedback software, Usersnap offers a free trial. Usersnap can seamlessly connect with GitHub and GitLab issues, streamlining the bug reporting process. If you’re looking for the biggest community of developers, chances are high that GitHub is the better place to be.
Those two platforms use Git, but they are not the only ones that can use this system, and other solutions and platforms also use this technology. However, the two platforms still have distinct differences regarding several aspects of user experience, which we’ll discuss later. GitHub is another code hosting platform and is a direct competitor to GitLab. It’s larger than GitLab and some other GitHub alternatives in valuation, although it seems that users are increasingly switching over to GitLab for reasons we will discuss later in the article. Yes, you can use GitLab and GitHub together because both are Git-based, allowing simultaneous use and flexibility. To use them together, set up automatic mirroring, add both as remote repositories or use each for different purposes to get the best out of both platforms.
What really matters is which Git VCS will give you the tools and services you need to best develop your software. When Microsoft acquired GitHub in 2018, many expected a mass exodus of its users. While some users did flee GitHub for GitLab and Atlassian BitBucket at the time, Microsoft taking over was never truly a huge factor for most.
